My Review of ‘Memento’ (2000)


As both a neo-noir film and psychological thriller, Memento is nothing less than a mind-blower.

The story involves two interwoven plotlines: one chronological storyline in black-and-white and one in color telling the story in reverse, as experienced by the protagonist Leonard Shelby (played by Guy Pearce), who has anterograde amnesia (meaning he can’t hold onto recent memories).

So the movie starts with the photo of a dead man, goes backwards to show him being shot, then switches gears and goes forward from a point well before the killing when Leonard tattoos himself, takes photos, and writes notes in an attempt to hang onto things he experienced five minutes before, but forgot.


Needless to say, the narrative has the highly disorienting effect that one would expect from suffering such a disorder. It’s also a very clever and skillfully exercised gimmick that only a great screenwriter could pull off well. To write in a genre as convoluted as noir and fiddle with the timeline so as to bring the audience into such a confused protagonist’s head requires a great deal of attention to detail and skill.

Pearce is splendid as the beleaguered Leonard Shelby. His face is a study in haunted determination.


Joe Pantoliano plays the rather annoying Teddy, who we know is dead from the get-go.


And, in a bid to add a weird love interest (I guess), Carrie Ann Moss plays Natalie, who’s initially pissed off at Leonard about something or other, then forgives him because of his memory problem.

QUALITY: 2ND GENERATION-- MEMENTO starring Guy Pearce, Carrie Ann Moss and Joe Pantoliano, written and directed by Christopher Nolan will open in the UK on October 20 2000-- The ambiguity of identity of Leonard Shelby (Guy Pearce), and that of Natalie (Carrie Ann Moss) and Teddy (Joe Pantoliano) is the crux of Memento. - The film is distributed by Pathe Film Distribution. All pictures should be credited MEMENTO © Pathe. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION PLEASE CONTACT THE PATHE PRESS OFFICE ON 020 7323 5151

Naturally, Leonard has no idea who he can trust, but Natalie and Teddy spend lots of time pointing fingers at each other and warning Leonard not to trust him/her.

Despite all the story’s fancy contortions, it all comes together at the end. Like a snake eating its own tail, the narrative circles back on itself and the end becomes the beginning. Or vice versa. Either way, as Leonard drives off at the end in a stolen borrowed car, the movie seems to peter off rather than conclude in a clear, definitive way.

I, for one, felt as dazed as Leonard might have been. The ending left me feeling like, “Okay, what just happened?” Which may well be the point.

Hand showing thumbs up. All on white background.

If the purpose of this movie is to tell a neo-noir, psychological thriller that disorients the viewer by replicating the experience of a disabled individual, I’d say it surely merits two thumbs up!

This entry was posted in Neo-Noir, Thriller and tagged , . Bookmark the permalink.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s