My Review of ‘Blue Velvet” (1986)


This was one of those films I was a bit squeamish about seeing. I’d seen Twin Peaks and I knew David Lynch could get weird, but did I really want to watch Dennis Hopper tormenting Isabella Rossellini while huffing possible animal nitrite?


Well, ultimately, I had to see this film, because I love David Lynch. Especially when he’s weird.

Kyle McLaughlin plays Jeffrey the Nice Guy who returns to his small hometown and, whilst taking a stroll, happens upon a severed ear. So, like any nice small-town guy, Jeffrey delivers the ear to the police. A Detective John Williams (played by George Dickinson) takes the ear, and Jeffrey meets Williams’ daughter, Sandy the Nice Girl (played by Laura Durn).


And Sandy, for all her niceness, tells Jeffrey about the ear case and how the mysterious Dorothy Vallens (a.k.a., Isabella Rossellini) may play a part. At that point, Jeffrey becomes very curious and goes into undercover mode. Which, in this case, involves pretending to be an exterminator so he snoop around Vallens’ apartment and steal her extra key to the place.


Well … after that it’s all sneaky-sneaky, with Jeffrey breaking in, hiding in the closet, and (eventually) seeing more than he wanted to. Especially when Frank Booth (played with psychotic glee by Dennis Hopper) starts huffing the old animal nitrite and repeating words like “mommy”, “daddy”, and “baby want to fuck”. Not to mention the words, “Do it for van Gogh”. A reference to the ear?


Without trotting out all the details, just trust me when I say it gets no easier for Jeffrey from here on.

The movie has been compared to Psycho, in its stark depiction of twisted evil and the theme of curiosity leading to the dark, voyeuristic underbelly beneath the surface of a small town. For that matter, I find it reminiscent of another Hitchcock classic, Shadow of a Doubt. Except far, far creepier.

It also combines psychological suspense, horror, and film noir, particularly in its use of dark cinematography, along with the standard noir tropes of femme fatale (Rossellini), add-ass villain (Hopper), and morally ambiguous protagonist (Jeffrey the Nice Guy, who enjoys the occasional peep show).


But what does this film say about us as the viewers? Is cinema ultimately voyeurism? Is there a dark underbelly in each of us that is drawn to stories such as these, but only at the safe distance?


If you’re easily frightened, I wouldn’t watch this film alone at night. I’m not usually suggestible, but this movie got under my skin to the point where part way through I started glancing over my shoulder to the steps going down to the lower level of our house, thinking, “Maybe I should turn the lights on down there.”

Finally, Isabella gets to sing “Blue Velvet” (of course). And Dean Stockwell (as a mincing fellow named Ben) gets to lip-synch to Roy Orbison’s “In Dreams”. Emphasizing the dreamlike quality of the picture. How very David Lynch!


The American Film Institute chose this movie is one of the greatest mystery films ever made. And I couldn’t agree more. Two thumbs up!

Hand showing thumbs up. All on white background.

This entry was posted in Horror, Neo-Noir, Suspense, Thriller and tagged , . Bookmark the permalink.

5 Responses to My Review of ‘Blue Velvet” (1986)

  1. I saw this when it first came out and it became a creepy campy obsession with my roommate and I. That is, until she recovered memories of abuse by her uncle. I had a real approach/avoidance issue with the film, but I think if I saw it again I’d roll my eyes more than cringe at the “baby wants to fuck” stuff, which really upset me on first viewing. Rape is rape, even when enmeshed in Lynch eerie artiness. I like your reading of the film as about voyeurism — and I’d add that we fool ourselves into thinking we see things clearly when we don’t, even after examination (see bird with worm in its mouth at end). Ultimately, it seems more shock for shock’s sake as a film, but I’ll see it again sometime with noir in mind. Here’s to your fuck, Frank.

    Liked by 1 person

    • I almost didn’t see this film. I thought it might be too creepy. But I do adore David Lynch and his surreal take on things.

      Someday, I guess I might see “Eraserhead”. That’s one I’ve been avoiding, even though I keep hearing it’s awesome.

      FYI, I almost didn’t see “Pulp Fiction”, because I worried it might be too violent. A friend urged me to see it, and I’ve never regretted the decision. 🙂

      Liked by 1 person

  2. Thanks for that comment! 🙂 I feel better about seeing it.


  3. Pingback: Return to 'Twin Peaks' - Debbi Mack

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s