My Review of ‘Suspicion’ (1941)

Like many a Hitchcock film, this one involves a train. In this instance, a man and woman meet on a train. They are Johnnie Aysgarth (played with debonair suave by Cary Grant) and Lina McLaidlaw (played with shy reserve by Joan Fontaine).

Lina is, of course, swept off her spinster-ish feet by the awesome Johnnie, and they elope. (Like many a Hitchcock film, romance happens fast!)

Well … after the honeymoon is over, it turns out Johnnie doesn’t have a dime to his name and is your basic bum. So, for sure, the honeymoon is definitely over. But Lina does manage to talk Johnnie into taking a job with his cousin, Captain Melbeck (played by Hitchcock favorite Leo G. Carroll).

Unfortunately, Johnnie is truly a loser. A shady, lying bastard of a loser, no less. And, despite assurances from his good-natured, but stupid naïve friend Beaky (played by Nigel Bruce, as if he were Dr. Watson’s halfwit twin), Lina develops suspicions about Johnnie, including the notion that he might want to “take care of” her, as the boys in Pulp Fiction might say—and I don’t mean keep her in the style to which she’s accustomed.

This is one of those movies where viewers have to restrain themselves from shouting at the screen, “Get out of the house!” The ending is … well … it wasn’t Hitchcock’s first choice.

In fact, there are numerous differences between the film and the book upon which it was based. Basically, the novel was rife with infidelity, which was completely laundered from the film version.

The book is much darker, but this is Cary Grant we’re talking here. So, the story’s details required tinkering in order to present Cary in the best light.

This makes for a thrilling and suspenseful film with just a nice ending.

As such, I like the movie, but it isn’t one of my very favorite Hitchcock films. However, despite the tacked-on Hollywood ending, I think it deserves at least one thumb up! 🙂

Advertisements
This entry was posted in Hitchcock, Movie Reviews, Psychological Thrillers, Suspense, Thriller and tagged , , . Bookmark the permalink.

7 Responses to My Review of ‘Suspicion’ (1941)

  1. I love this one, but wish that Hitch had got to film a different ending. Having said that though the ending works because the film is focusing on her suspicion. Sometimes suspicion and rumour can make you see someone in a way that may not be true. The film is all about her perception and fear. Fontaine is excellent, and Grant gets to play a different character than we are used to seeing him play.

    Liked by 1 person

  2. This isn’t my fave Hitchcock film either, although it is beautifully filmed. I just think the ending is a rip-off, especially when the whole movie is set up for a different result.

    But, like you said, it’s still an entertaining film, and definitely worth watching.

    Liked by 1 person

  3. I am a huge Cary Grant fan and I do enjoy his collaborations with Hitchcock. However, I remember being disappointed for the same reason as you, Debbi with the ending. My favorite film with Grant is North by Northwest. Although I am truly surprised that Hitch didn’t hint at the infidelities. He was a master of the disguised references.

    Liked by 1 person

    • Debbi says:

      North by Northwest is also my favorite with Grant. In many ways, it’s one of my favorite movies of all!

      I think Hitchcock took some flack from the studio about the ending. But he was a clever one when it came to alluding to matters too dark to be made obvious and pass studio muster. 🙂 Oh, well …

      Liked by 1 person

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s